|
|
'Céline Forestier' rose Reviews & Comments
-
-
|
Correct release to commerce year would be 1859: Standish is advertising it in the April 30, 1859, issue of Gardeners’ Chronicle (p. 378), as among the “New Roses for 1859 […]. All of the above plants are now ready to send out,” and repeats the ad in subsequent issues of the 1859 Gardeners' Chronicle.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 1 posted
3 JAN by
 jedmar
|
Introduction date modified, thank you!
|
REPLY
|
-
-
|
Please can anyone tell me if this rose sets hips, and if so, what the resulting seedlings are like?
|
REPLY
|
|
Hmf lists these as descendants:
Madame Gustave Fargeton
Starlight (hybrid multiflora, Paul, 1909)
The Sweet Little Queen of Holland
|
REPLY
|
|
Thanks Margaret. Shame none of them seem to be in commerce, as I would like to have seen the results of Celine Forestier's motherhood, so to speak.
|
REPLY
|
|
I have a rooted cutting on order from Rose Valley Roses.
|
REPLY
|
|
I just purchased one recently from Burlington.
|
REPLY
|
|
"what the resulting seedlings are like?"
This depends on what you use it with.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
|
Does anyone have any experience of how shade tollerant this rose is?
Thanks in advance,
Steve
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
21 MAR 12 by
Jbeyer
|
I was looking on Vintage Gardens about this rose it doesn't say anything about it being a climber? I guess it could be a climber if allowed to.. Right? If I get one I don't want it to climb...
|
REPLY
|
|
Doesn't have to climb. Mine has been free standing for over 10 years. You will have to shorten up some of the longer canes to grow it as a Shrub.
|
REPLY
|
|
I am also hoping to grow this rose. There are some beautiful pictures that people have put on here.
|
REPLY
|
|
