HelpMeFind Roses, Clematis and Peonies
Roses, Clematis and Peonies
and everything gardening related.
DescriptionPhotosLineageAwardsReferencesMember RatingsMember CommentsMember JournalsCuttingsGardensBuy From 
'George Elger' rose Reviews & Comments
Discussion id : 169-070
most recent yesterday HIDE POSTS
 
Initial post yesterday by Margaret Furness
Leonie Kearney Heritage Roses, Samsonvale, Queensland; Trewallyn Nursery, Queensland; and Ross Roses, SA have stock plants..
REPLY
Discussion id : 123-493
most recent 21 OCT 20 HIDE POSTS
 
Initial post 20 OCT 20 by bibi
The George Elger sold in Europe seems to be Perle d'or. I have bought two plants, one in Germany and one in France and I don't manage to make a difference with Perle d'or. They are not yellow like on your photos.
REPLY
Reply #1 of 5 posted 20 OCT 20 by Margaret Furness
Yes, the first three photos on the George Elger file, taken in Europe, look like Perle d'Or.
Our George Elger - of which there are only a few plants left - is yellow, but not "coppery yellow" as in the early references. .
REPLY
Reply #2 of 5 posted 20 OCT 20 by jedmar
This is the L'Hay photo of 'Georges Elger' which they have
REPLY
Reply #4 of 5 posted 20 OCT 20 by Margaret Furness
It would be interesting to know whether the Georges Elger at L'Hay is thornless. The Australian one seems to be, and there's been a suggestion that the foundling "Schmidt's Smooth Yellow" in the US may be the same rose. Both have a red tinge on the buds, which might fit in with the coppery-yellow description. No mention of absence of prickles in the references for George Elger.
REPLY
Reply #3 of 5 posted 20 OCT 20 by bibi
Who still have or sell the yellow George Elger ?
Apparently by reading l'Hay les roses website they don't have Georges Elger in culture anymore.
REPLY
Reply #5 of 5 posted 21 OCT 20 by jedmar
Yes, it seems two plants were planted in 2000 and removed end of 2006. Indicates it was also an incorrect rose.
REPLY
Discussion id : 119-488
most recent 25 DEC 19 HIDE POSTS
 
Initial post 23 DEC 19 by AquaEyes
Margaret, I wish to thank you immensely for adding some more pictures to 'George Elger' on here. And someone please thank Ozoldroser as well. Jeri Jennings recently posted some pics of her "Schmidt's Smooth Yellow" on the Antique Roses Forum on Houzz (formerly GardenWeb), and it engendered a rehash of my thought that that rose is actually 'George Elger'. Jacqueline Schmidt -- the discoverer of the found-rose -- agreed that photos of 'George Elger' are identical to her "Schmidt's Smooth Yellow." I understand that one of Malcolm Manners' students has included a genetic comparison between "Schmidt's Smooth Yellow" and 'Sunshine', purported to be a seedling of 'George Elger'. Whenever those results become published, we'll have more evidence.

The discussions below:

www.houzz.com/discussions/5841095/schmidt-s-smooth-yellow#n=17

www.houzz.com/discussions/5406060/schmidt-s-smooth-yellow#n=28

:-)

~Christopher
REPLY
Reply #1 of 8 posted 23 DEC 19 by Robert Neil Rippetoe
As an aside but adding to the possible attribution, I've noted that Turbat was also responsible for other introductions that led to smooth offspring, such as 'Étoile Luisante', and it's offspring, 'Renae'.
REPLY
Reply #2 of 8 posted 24 DEC 19 by Margaret Furness
You're welcome. I have given my cutting-grown plants away to nurseries and a major repository, but it's time I kept one for myself. Such a joy to have a poly that doesn't bite.
REPLY
Reply #3 of 8 posted 24 DEC 19 by Robert Neil Rippetoe
"Such a joy to have a poly that doesn't bite"


OR ANY rose that doesn't bite!



Over the years I have been eaten alive.

Just so folks know. It's EASY to breed smooth roses. I've bred many.

There's no need at all for roses to bite the hand that feeds them.

If gardener sought them out we would have no more vicious roses to contend with. =)
REPLY
Reply #4 of 8 posted 24 DEC 19 by Margaret Furness
I tried to breed smooth groundcovers. i selected all the seedlings which were smooth in their first year. The second year, they changed...
REPLY
Reply #5 of 8 posted 25 DEC 19 by Robert Neil Rippetoe
You need to choose your genetics more wisely. YES, smooth groundcovers are a great goal to keep in mind. Honestly, I have never tried to breed one but it wouldn't be specially difficult.

Roses as groundcovers seem not to be too popular here in general. Of course that could be because the prickles are so problematic??
REPLY
Reply #6 of 8 posted 25 DEC 19 by Plazbo
The multiflora rootstock Thomas For Roses used is entirely thornless (including the spikes commonly under leaflets). Granted it appears to be once blooming and possibly not the best base to create a ground cover from but may have some use in being a stepping stone, particularly given how many ground covers are diploid/triploid.
REPLY
Reply #7 of 8 posted 25 DEC 19 by Robert Neil Rippetoe
Actually some of us are way past this now. The work has already been done on both a tetra and diploid level.

The problem is most companies are not willing to market the products because they just don't see the need for it.

Smoothness will only come along for the ride assuming all other commercial requirements are met.
REPLY
Reply #8 of 8 posted 25 DEC 19 by Margaret Furness
Several problems - nasty to weed among prickles, and you have to because "groundcover" roses generally aren't dense enough to suppress weeds: and they're a long way down to deadhead, unless you follow advice I was given and use a golfclub.
See separate posting re Thomas for Roses.
REPLY
Discussion id : 116-983
most recent 30 MAY 19 HIDE POSTS
 
Initial post 30 MAY 19 by CybeRose
The Rose in India p. 289 (1972)
Benjamin Peary Pal
GEORGE ELGER (Turbat, 1912); also known as YELLOW BABY RAMBLER
Clear yellow but with a coppery shading. Dwarf-growing. One of the few yellow Polyanthas. 
REPLY
© 2024 HelpMeFind.com