"Additionally, the new variety displays (unnamed x ‘KORassenet’) variety (i.e., pollen parent) exhibits cream colored flower, whereas the new variety forms pink colored flowers with a higher petal count and has stronger vigor."
I think I had a stroke reading this. I guess this made it through USPTO lol. The new variety is clearly not pink :)
The patent text here wants to refer to the seedling pollen parent, but the term "new variety" is definitely an error. Exhibits cream colored flower is incorrect grammar and pink and cream were juxtaposed. All missed by Kordes, the patent lawyer and the patent examiner. LOL
