|
Recent Questions, Answers and Comments
-
-
Initial post
today by
Ericchn
Be patient with this rose: it slowly improves in every aspect, even in its fourth year.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
today by
GoldBeardThePirate
I am trilled I was able to get one this spring from WIRoses. I was so curious about this one after seeing it on here and googling it. They happen to have an established one when I emailed in. It just bloomed and it's stunning. First rose blooms are often not the best, and form what Ive read roses take out 3 years in their new location to really show their true selves. If this is year one I can only imagine an established flower. The color is coral pink and has a really nice form to it. I did do a soil drench and its only got about 3 leaves with spot. No fragrance yet but it's been crazy hot and this is only its first set of flowers. I hope this one keeps making it into collections as it deserves its place in the rose library.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
yesterday by
fenriz
Hello again, I’ve found this Rose with big white flowers 2 weeks ago. She has no thorns (!) and grew next to a rose arch which was occupied by an overgrowing rootstock or wild rose. The habit was more hybrid-tea like but the location or overgrowing rootstock seemed to have weakened her just a bit. Nevertheless she grew over a meter, seemed too stiff to be a climber, but she could be cut more than needed. She flowered mid-june in Germany and for now (end of june) has no flowers just big green pedicels (?). Big white flowers with a pink hue, could be scented but I just remember their beauty. Didn’t seem like Gruß an Aachen to me, but that one is a shape-shifter.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 3 posted
yesterday by
Margaret Furness
If it produces more crops of flowers, it would be worth looking at Mme Alfred Carriere. Most people consider it scented. Though it would be ambitious for someone to plant a rose which can get very big, in a restricted site.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#2 of 3 posted
yesterday by
fenriz
Thank you! I think it really is Mme. Alfred Carriere. All those features revealed her, even the unripe hips check as well. Her anomaly could be explained by the subpar location which the rootstock took advantage of. But don’t be fooled, the arch is over 2 meters at the highest point, but you’re right a Noisette will still need and take up more space. Even two low-climbing Roses would have been better suited, but they may not possess the beauty of those flowers.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#3 of 3 posted
today by
Margaret Furness
You're welcome. I can't help with your red rose, unless it's Crimson Glory (1935) - I don't know modern roses at all.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
today by
Margaret Furness
The colour isn't what I expect from this rose, but light conditions and cameras can affect that.
|
REPLY
|
|