HelpMeFind Roses, Clematis and Peonies
Roses, Clematis and Peonies
and everything gardening related.
Search PostsPosts By CategoryRecent Posts 
Recent Questions, Answers and Comments
most recent yesterday SHOW ALL
 
Initial post 18 DEC by Magical fog kingdom
Nice to have a red climber that does well in SF.
REPLY
Reply #1 of 3 posted 8 days ago by SDShine
I'm in the Oakland hills where we get quite a bit of fog at night that settles here. I've got a spot that gets about 6 hrs sun in the AM, and shade in the PM. Based on your experience, do you think Florentina would do well? Thanks so much.
REPLY
Reply #2 of 3 posted 8 days ago by Magical fog kingdom
Hi!
Yes it should do just fine. No more blackspot than any other healthy roses in our climate.
REPLY
Reply #3 of 3 posted yesterday by SDShine
Thank you for your reply! One more question: how’s repeat blooming for you? The description here says occasional repeat later in the summer but bloom frequency is rated ‘excellent’ by reviewers… Thanks again!
REPLY
most recent yesterday HIDE POSTS
 
Initial post yesterday by PatProfessor
The discoverer's surname is Wathen, not Walthen.
REPLY
Reply #1 of 1 posted yesterday by jedmar
Corrected, thank you!
REPLY
most recent yesterday SHOW ALL
 
Initial post 27 APR 17 by Gdisaz10
Is this plant very disease resistance or not?
REPLY
Reply #1 of 2 posted 28 APR 17 by Jay-Jay
When You look at the member ratings for this rose, two members consider this rose excellent, as for disease resistance.
I grow Himmelsauge (in commerce as) and people say it IS Russelliana and that rose is very healthy too.
See "Reviews and Comments" at: http://www.helpmefind.com/gardening/l.php?l=2.27983&tab=1
REPLY
Reply #2 of 2 posted yesterday by Gdisaz10
Good
REPLY
most recent yesterday HIDE POSTS
 
Initial post yesterday by PatProfessor
A United States patent application for Wekmeymo, #11/820,136, in the name of Lawrence E. Meyer and assigned to Weeks, was filed 6/18/2007. It was published 12/18/2008, as US Patent Publication 2008/0313779-P1. The application was initially rejected based on some easily correctable formalities. However, Weeks chose not to pursue the application and abandoned it.
REPLY
Reply #1 of 2 posted yesterday by jedmar
Patent application and further info added, thank you!
REPLY
Reply #2 of 2 posted yesterday by PatProfessor
There is no indication that Weeks abandoned the application due to registration of a similar rose. I originally thought this might be the case, but Yoyo was not cited in the prosecution history by either the applicant or the patent examiner. When they apply for a patent, applicants are required to cite the closest prior art of which they are aware, so they probably were not even aware of its existence. A more likely reason is that there was limited commercial potential for a miniature rose similar to Gizmo.
REPLY
© 2025 HelpMeFind.com