|
|
-
-
|
The discoverer's surname is Wathen, not Walthen.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 1 posted
4 days ago by
 jedmar
|
Corrected, thank you!
|
REPLY
|
-
-
|
A United States patent application for Wekmeymo, #11/820,136, in the name of Lawrence E. Meyer and assigned to Weeks, was filed 6/18/2007. It was published 12/18/2008, as US Patent Publication 2008/0313779-P1. The application was initially rejected based on some easily correctable formalities. However, Weeks chose not to pursue the application and abandoned it.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 2 posted
4 days ago by
jedmar
|
Patent application and further info added, thank you!
|
REPLY
|
|
There is no indication that Weeks abandoned the application due to registration of a similar rose. I originally thought this might be the case, but Yoyo was not cited in the prosecution history by either the applicant or the patent examiner. When they apply for a patent, applicants are required to cite the closest prior art of which they are aware, so they probably were not even aware of its existence. A more likely reason is that there was limited commercial potential for a miniature rose similar to Gizmo.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
|
The US plant patent is #3084, not #3083.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
|
Codename seems to imply Secret x unknown. Clearly something smaller than Secret.
|
REPLY
|
|
According to today's presentation: Secret x Dick Clark
|
REPLY
|
|
Oddly, that actually makes sense.
|
REPLY
|
|
