|
|
-
-
|
I was very impressed by this rose in online videos and here the fragrance is rated as 'very strong' but Tantau who sell the rose only give it a 2star for fragrance ?
|
REPLY
|
|
My Artemis is in its fourth year, three years cut down very low for good branching. It has sun from about 1 p.m. until evening - its head can see the sky, the shade comes from a house.
For me there is scent, but I really have to put my nose right into the bud. (comparison : the scent intenstity would be the same as for Garden of Roses / Joie de vivre; whereas other roses for me have strong scent: e. g. Johann Wolfgang von Goethe / Pure Poetry; Stephens‘ Big Purple; Munstead Wood, Scepter’d Isle; …)
(The colour for me is creamwhite with a mixture of yellow (like the yellow colour of an artifical vanilla custard). Especially the closed buds and the inner of an opened flower show that yellowish / vanilla colour. So this vanilla - cream - white is seen from bud to flower until it shatters.)
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
20 MAR 15 by
moriah
|
If you have one on it's own root, you only need one as the roots spread and shoots come up near by.
|
REPLY
|
|
Wow that's good, as I love this cultivar, and just bought one on own roots!
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#3 of 11 posted
10 JUN 23 by
 Jay-Jay
|
It suckers a lot, maybe more than You would like it to do.
|
REPLY
|
|
Ok... I'll see if I love this rose enough ahahah
Anyway, this is another very Gallica-like trait. This plant is really like a strongly reblooming Gallica hybrid. Pretty unique in the entire rose world, I think.
|
REPLY
|
|
Update: my own roots Rose de Resht is doing unbelievably well, despite being still in a 6 l container. She's suckering and blooming like there's no tomorrow, developing in a thick mass of fragrant foliage and developing flower buds (she had already given a fair number of blooms before).
I'm keeping all my new roses well watered and fertilized, and I added some mycorrhizal supplement too.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#6 of 11 posted
24 JAN by
odinthor
|
'Rose de Rescht' seems to have been confused in commerce with 'Rose du Roi'. I have had a very healthy own-root 'Rose de Rescht' for decades, and never once has it produced a sucker or runner. This was discussed in another (now-gone) forum of knowledgable old rose experts years ago, and the consensus was that there is a large contingent of supposed 'Rose de Rescht' out there which are actually 'Rose du Roi' specimens, as a large group of people had the "runner version," and an equally large group had the "never any runners version." Unfortunately, none of the posters had both, so a point by point comparison of them was never posted.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#7 of 11 posted
24 JAN by
Jay-Jay
|
Which of the photographed or pictured Roses du Roi do You mean?
Almost none look like the picture Jonathan Windham posted.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#8 of 11 posted
24 JAN by
odinthor
|
My point is in relation to comments on suckers or runners vis-a-vis 'Rose du Rescht' and 'Rose du Roi', not any of the HMF pictures of 'Rose du Roi'.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#9 of 11 posted
24 JAN by
Jay-Jay
|
I'm not talking about pictures odinthor.
I'm referring to which of those roses de-pictured as Rose du Roi would You like to compare with those depictured as Rose de Rescht as for the habit of suckering?
What withholds You from comparing Yourselves? I would be interested in Your outcome.
|
REPLY
|
|
I'm told that "Rose de Rescht" in commerce in Australia is now consistently what we think is Joasine Hanet. Which suckers.
|
REPLY
|
|
'Joasine Hanet', AKA "Portland from Glendora" in the USA is a tall rosebush. Mine grows to about 5' and I think it gets even taller in warmer climates. I believe 'Rose de Resht' remains at around 3-4'.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
|
hello Marita, thank you for posting this. can you tell me how healthy is this rose.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
|
amazing, thank you for your photos
|
REPLY
|
|
