|
|
-
-
Initial post
12 JUL 20 by
Du Roi
-
-
Initial post
10 JUL 20 by
Du Roi
|
Did some research.
this Rose is for 99% Rosa helenae.
Thank you for your comment.
Not the first Rose I Bought with a wrong name, believe me.
Remove this image in a few days.
And replace it under Rosa helenae.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 1 posted
10 JUL 20 by
 jedmar
-
-
|
the leaves look wrong for Brunonii
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 3 posted
9 JUL 20 by
Du Roi
|
I have this rose from seeds. Rosa brunonii.
Bought them 4 years ago.
Seeds are from U.K. South England.
I have a second shrub also from seeds no flowers yet.
bud with the same leaves.
Are these hybrids ??
Maybe Rosa x montariosa ??
|
REPLY
|
|
I got my seed in Yunnan and believe it to be R.brunonii, see my pictures as posted, often with wild collected seed there is a variation, so we probably both have R.brunonii. It is very admirable to grow your roses from seed as it takes a while before they flower.
|
REPLY
|
|
The Mt Lofty Botanic Garden in South Australia grew many species roses from seed. Unfortunately this became a problem, as many of them sucker when grown on their own roots, and it became difficult to tell which plant belonged to which label. Eventually almost all were removed. A rose labelled R brunonii is still there, so I'm guessing it didn't sucker. www.helpmefind.com/rose/l.php?l=21.162544
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
9 JUL 20 by
Du Roi
|
Maybe this is Rosa helenae ??
|
REPLY
|
|
