|
|
-
-
Initial post
23 SEP 11 by
AnneU
|
Per site rogersroses.com, parentage for 'Salammbo'/DELperl = {(‘Dame du Feu’ X ‘Guinée’) X (‘Tenore’ X ‘Fugue’) X (‘Grimpant Delbard’ X ‘Gloire de Dijon’)} X {‘Rouge Meilland’ X ‘Soraya’}.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 3 posted
25 SEP 11 by
 jedmar
|
Thank you, if you ever find a reference for this complex parentage....
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#2 of 3 posted
25 APR 23 by
Huyustus
|
Hello, To simplify , Seed = Messire Delbard
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#3 of 3 posted
25 APR 23 by
jedmar
|
Yes, sound most probable that there was not a sister seedling of 'Messire Delbard' with the same complex parentage.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
10 APR 10 by
AnneU
|
Could it be that Rosa pimpinellifolia plena and Rosa spinosissima plena are the same? See both rose in HMF.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 3 posted
11 APR 10 by
Cass
|
It is possible and very hard to determine, as the French name is cited only in Vibert's catalogs from the early 1800s. The naming of Hybrid Spinosissimas is a terrible mess.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#2 of 3 posted
12 APR 10 by
AnneU
|
I understand, thanks for your reply
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
3 MAY 11 by
AnneU
|
Could it be that Comtesse de Chaponnay and Comtesse de Chaponay are the same rose? Per data on both roses, it seems so.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 1 posted
3 APR 19 by
AmiRoses
|
Yes, the correct spelling is Chaponay.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
18 AUG 10 by
AnneU
|
Per site everyrose.com, ‘Candle Light’, a climbing miniature, has been bred by Warner in 1995.
|
REPLY
|
|
It is. I owned it eons ago. Its like a more complicated version of Laura Ford. I didn't keep it, however. Forgot why.
|
REPLY
|
|
