One or more site guests believe this photo is incorrectly labeled or inaccurate !
-
-
|
I agree, this is the shrub rose Cecile Brunner that grows 2-4', this should be in the climbing Cecile Brunner rose http://www.helpmefind.com/rose/pl.php?n=891.
You as the submitter would have to delete your image yourself and then resubmit it in the correct category.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
|
This appears to be the Climbing Cecile Brunner, and not the older bush form, which is relatively small. This section is for Cecile Brunner, the original bush form.
(Both are beautiful. I just believe this photo belongs with the Climbing form. Thank you.)
|
REPLY
|
-
-
|
Hi! I just noticed your lovely pix of Cl. Cecile Brunner, and wanted to say -- this should be in the page for the climber, not the bush!
It's a spectacular shot. :-)
Jeri Jennings
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
13 MAY 08 by
jedmar
|
Unbelievably gorgeous! How old is your plant (or is it more than one?) and what is the total length? Isn't this actually the climbing version?
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 2 posted
13 MAY 08 by
jdsong
|
Climbing yes, not sure of its age I did not plant it.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#2 of 2 posted
13 MAY 08 by
jedmar
|
Thanks. Maybe the picture would be better posted under 'Cecile Brunner, Cl.' by Hosp.
|
REPLY
|
