'The King's Rose' reviews and comments

	Description		Photos		Lineage		Awards		References		Member Ratings		Member Comments		Member Journals		Cuttings		Gardens		Buy From

'The King's Rose' Reviews & Comments

My HMF:

☐ POST COMMENT

Discussion id : 172-672

most recent today HIDE POSTS

Initial post 2 days ago by HMF supporting member

HubertG

I've sometimes wondered why the Austins never produced striped roses before. Considering there are enough striped examples amongst the old garden roses, it always seemed to me to be a natural direction for them to take. Perhaps it was just a matter of personal taste as not everyone likes striped roses. A striped Austin rose in their classic 'English' form would be wonderful in my opinion.	REPLY

Reply #1 of 6 posted 2 days ago by HMF supporting member

Lee H.

Hubert, that’s an idea with strong commercial potential, in my opinion. Food for thought.

There is “something” about striped roses. I recently hosted a rose garden party for my church, and while I was busy trying to point out the perfect form of ‘Frau Karl Druschki’, the delicate coloration of ‘Souvenir de la Malmaison’, and the rich history of ‘The Apothecary Rose’, everybody was running over to meet the cute girl in the miniskirt: ‘Scentimental’.

Reply #2 of 6 posted yesterday by HMF supporting member

HubertG

Lee, yes, there's a reason why old stripey roses like 'Commandant Beaurepaire' and 'Honorine de Brabant' have remained in commerce so long ... it's because they're so appealing, and beautiful in my opinion. Both those roses are more cupped and closer to the 'English' form than this new 'The King's Rose', so perhaps we'll see more striped roses like that from Austin in the future.

I like striped varieties in general but they can be a bit hit and miss taste-wise. Some are beautiful and just really work; some are garish and just don't work, in my opinion. I guess a good analogy would be striped wallpaper - some kinds are well proportioned and tasteful and some are just hideous, but there are people who will still buy the hideous ones lol.

Reply #3 of 6 posted yesterday by Marlorena

I'm not speaking for them but it should be pointed out that this rose was produced in conjunction with the King's charity, the King's Foundation, which is ecologically based, so the rose needed to meet certain criteria, which means easy to grow with minimum feeding and watering, and stamens for pollinators. A big, many petalled rose with no visible stamens simply wouldn't meet this criteria, and needing so much watering and feeding to produce those blooms.
For every rose sold, a percentage is given to the King's Foundation.

Some of us here in UK have had the driest Spring since 1852. We are in drought where I am. Single and semi double roses are the way to go right now, unless the roses are well established. So this semi double appealed to me very much.

Incidentally, from what I gather, it seems the idea was to produce a repeat flowering rose of the Rosa mundi type, and it has been strongly hinted that 'Ferdinand Pichard' is in the lineage, and perhaps those other two roses mentioned, further back..
The growth habit has taken me by surprise in that it's similar to what you find in some Polyantha roses like Nathalie Nypels, as far as flowering shoots are concerned, where they emanate from nodes further down the stem, at the same time as the terminal cluster. I've always found pruning such roses a little problematic.

Reply #4 of 6 posted yesterday by HMF supporting member

HubertG

I did figure that they were aiming for the original Rosa Mundi type with this new rose. Thanks for your insight, Marlorena. I hope you get some rain soon. We've had too much of it lately in Sydney with flooding in some parts of NSW.	REPLY

Reply #5 of 6 posted yesterday by jac123

We have detailed reports of how Ralph Moore managed to get the striped gene out of Ferdinand Pichard. All the striped roses in commerce, besides sports of solid coloured varieties, come from it. We also know that the original cross Ralph Moore did was not that easy, with few seedlings being striped and most (if not all, I'm not sure) were once bloomers. On the contrary, striped are very easy to introduce in a breeding pool using modern, striped varieties, as it is a dominant gene.

If at Austin's they really went back to Ferdinand Pichard only to get a striped, pink semidouble they must really love unnecessary challenges - maybe they just meant that the colour is reminiscent of Ferdinand Pichard or that stripes originally come from it.

I've also noticed from photos taken at Chelsea that its foliage is folded towards the center as in some other Austin varieties, such as the Ancient Mariner. I wonder if they come from the same blood line

Reply #6 of 6 posted today by HMF supporting member

HubertG

Austin's website says it was twelve years in the making so I wonder if that's enough time to start from scratch with 'Ferdinand Pichard'. Maybe, maybe not. Austin relates a conversation with Prince Charles back in the 90s when Prince Charles told him that Ferdinand Pichard was the first rose he ever grew, so the idea of this new rose can be traced back to that meeting in a way.

It looks quite pretty, the bud clusters almost like a Hybrid Musk. I notice in a video on the Austin website that they say it has "some fragrance". Without smelling it, it's hard to say exactly what that means but it suggests to me it might not be strong.

I see it won a gold medal from the Royal Horticultural Society at Chelsea this year.