|
'Eyeconic Honey Lemonade' rose Reviews & Comments
-
-
For Eyeconic honey lemonade, the listed parent in the patent is correct, but not in the parentage on the site. Should be MORtoday and not MORday. Thank you! Jim Sproul
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 1 posted
28 MAR 23 by
jedmar
Corrected, thank you!
|
REPLY
|
-
-
"Varietal denomination: cv. Spromel.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The new variety of landscape shrub rose plant of the present invention was created by artificial pollination carried out in April/May 2008 at Bakersfield, Calif., U.S.A., wherein two parents were crossed which previously had been studied in the hope that they would contribute the desired characteristics. Each parent possessed a complex parentage as indicated hereafter. More specifically, the parentage of the non-patented female parent (i.e., seed parent) can be summarized as follows: {`MORtoday`.times.[`Geisha`.times.(`KINbo`.times.`Macivy`)]}.times.`SPRoi- mpress`. The male parent (i.e., pollen parent) was the `Sprolych` variety (U.S. Plant patent application Ser, No. 13/998,618, filed Nov. 18, 2013). The `SPRoimpress` variety is the subject of U.S. Plant Pat. No. 21,708. The other ancestoral plants of the female parent are non-patented in the United States. "
-US Patent PP25,125
|
REPLY
|
Which Geisha do you think, Michael?
|
REPLY
|
Not Michael, but it was this one.
http://www.helpmefind.com/rose/l.php?l=2.2913&tab=1
|
REPLY
|
Thanks Michael - and Robert. Parentage added.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Available from - Growquest www.growquest.com
|
REPLY
|
|