|
|
'Baby Vougeot' rose Reviews & Comments
-
-
Initial post
28 FEB 20 by
flodur
|
The reference "Rosenjahrbuch, Book (2017) Page(s) 25". is not correct. Baby Château is not mentioned in that book!
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 3 posted
28 FEB 20 by
 jedmar
|
Wrong year, the reference is taken from a Google snippet which states 1968, but could well be an adjacent year.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#2 of 3 posted
28 FEB 20 by
flodur
|
Danke, habe ich gefunden. Victor Teschendorff, Dresden, nennt in seinem Rosenkatalog von 1936, Aroma x Hamburg als Eltern.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#3 of 3 posted
today by
HubertG
|
I just came across the entry for 'Baby Chateau' in the Kordes 1936 catalogue when it was introduced and they themselves give the parentage as 'Aroma' x 'Hamburg'.
Their 1935 catalogue also gives a parentage for 'Hamburg' as 'Eva' x 'Daily Mail Scented Rose'.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
31 JUL 09 by
Don H
|
From this discussion at the Heritage Rose Foundation forum, it seems like Baby Chateau is no longer extant at the Cranford.
http://www.heritagerosefoundation.org/discus/messages/2/2747.html?1166147491
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 1 posted
31 JUL 09 by
Robert Neil Rippetoe
|
I inquired about this a few years ago. Yes, it's a real shame.
|
REPLY
|
|
