|
|
'Joasine Hanet' rose Reviews & Comments
-
-
Initial post
21 JUL 14 by
flodur
|
'Joasine Hanet' im Handel und Fundrose "Glendora" sind wohl identische Rosen, aber nicht die 'Joasine Hanet', die Vibert 1847 gezüchtet hat. Denn laut The Rose Garden, 1848, S. 108 ist diese "purplish red" und laut Wesselhöft, Der Rosenfreund 1866, S. 149 "leuchtend purpurroth". Auch wenn "Identification as Joasine Hanet is accepted by the ARS". Ich schließe mich dann doch lieber den Zweifeln von "several expert rosarians" an. In Sangerhausen steht eine 'Joasine Hanet', die eher den frühen Farbbeschreibungen entspricht.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 1 posted
29 DEC 20 by
 petera
|
I have added an English translation of Flodur's comment as I think it should be available to more people.
'Joasine Hanet' in trade and the found rose "Glendora" are probably identical roses, but not the' Joasine Hanet 'that Vibert bred in 1847. Because according to The Rose Garden, 1848, p. 108, this is "purplish red" and according to Wesselhöft, Der Rosenfreund 1866, p. 149 "bright purple". Even if "Identification as Joasine Hanet is accepted by the ARS". I prefer to join the doubts of "several expert rosarians". In Sangerhausen there is a 'Joasine Hanet', which corresponds more to the early color descriptions.
|
REPLY
|
|
